Dieser Artikel beschreibt die wichtigsten Raumschiffe und Raumstationen, die auch Sternenbasen genannt werden, im fiktiven Star-Trek-Universum. Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1 Raumschiffe mit dem Namensbestandteil Enterprise Die Discovery ist ein experimentelles Schiff der Crossfield-Klasse, auf der der Sporenantrieb. Die U.S.S. Enterprise Ncc in der Discovery Version ist nun Teil der Star Trek Discovery Raumschiffsammlung! Star Trek - Discovery: Der Enterprise-Krieg (German Edition) - Kindle edition by Miller, John Jackson, Parmiter, Helga. Download it once and read it on your.

Enterprise Discovery Verwandte Beiträge

Im Jahr , Jahre nach den Abenteuern von Captain Archer und zehn Jahre vor denen von Captain Kirk, erkundet die USS Discovery um Offizier Michael Burnham die unendlichen Welten und wird in einen interstellaren Krieg verwickelt. Da die Enterprise beschädigt ist, kommt deren Kommandant Pike als Captain auf die Discovery. Dieser vermisst seinen Wissenschaftsoffizier Spock, dessen. Dieser Artikel beschreibt die wichtigsten Raumschiffe und Raumstationen, die auch Sternenbasen genannt werden, im fiktiven Star-Trek-Universum. Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1 Raumschiffe mit dem Namensbestandteil Enterprise Die Discovery ist ein experimentelles Schiff der Crossfield-Klasse, auf der der Sporenantrieb. Die Enterprise und ihre Crew werden wir in der dritten Staffel von „Discovery“ jedoch offenbar nicht wiedersehen: Die Verträge von Anson Mount. Star Trek: Discovery (Abkürzung DSC) ist die siebte Star-Trek-Serie. Die Serie spielt in den ersten beiden Staffeln 10 Jahre vor Raumschiff Enterprise. Die U.S.S. Enterprise Ncc in der Discovery Version ist nun Teil der Star Trek Discovery Raumschiffsammlung! Star Trek - Discovery: Der Enterprise-Krieg (German Edition) - Kindle edition by Miller, John Jackson, Parmiter, Helga. Download it once and read it on your.

Star Trek: Discovery (Abkürzung DSC) ist die siebte Star-Trek-Serie. Die Serie spielt in den ersten beiden Staffeln 10 Jahre vor Raumschiff Enterprise. Die U.S.S. Enterprise Ncc in der Discovery Version ist nun Teil der Star Trek Discovery Raumschiffsammlung! Star Trek - Discovery: Der Enterprise-Krieg (German Edition) - Kindle edition by Miller, John Jackson, Parmiter, Helga. Download it once and read it on your.

Enterprise Discovery EINE BEWERTUNG SCHREIBEN

Anthony Rapp. Ausgabe 4 Klingonischer Bird-of-Prey Modell. Charakteristisch für die Korridore in der Originalserie sind graue Wände mit roten Applikationen beziehungsweise The Nun Streamkiste. Ein Widerspruch besteht allerdings in der Registriernummer der Discovery. Ausgabe 27 Krenim-Zeitwaffenschiff Modell. Vereinzelt sind zudem rote Gitterwände in den Korridoren installiert. Ich stimme dem Autor vollumfänglich zu, alles sehr gut umgesetzt, bis auf die angesprochenen Uniformen, was generell Kanonbruch ist. Ausgabe Die Plötzlich Unsichtbar in der Originalserie Ed Lauter relativ unspektakulär.

Enterprise Discovery RESERVATIONS Video

Enterprise destroys Discovery (Short Treks: Farewell Discovery)

The sooner Trek fans hung up on the look of a TV show from the s drop off the franchise, the better for the future of the franchise.

I have seen plenty of art and videos of the old next to the Discovery and nothing about the two feel like they remotely belong in the same era.

To me its like trying to compare a Mustang from the 60s to a Mustang today. You can tell they were made by the same company but they are different looking cars with some similarities.

But no one is trying to pretend they were both made in the same era. The Discovery looks totally wrong. Again, Rogue One is the perfect example of how to stay absolutely true to the original era A New Hope and yet apply such skill and production values that while looking authentic it also looks cutting edge.

No one complained about Rogue One looking too retro. Yet you can run it with A New Hope as a double feature and the mesh between the two is visually seamless.

The difference with TOS is that its suppose to be presenting OUR future several centuries from now and yet their computers are bulkier than ours years in the future.

Their ship interior looks like a campy sixties set compared to today. People are wearing bee hive and go go boots. Maybe at the time, sure, but certainly not today and thats the issue.

I will agree they did do a great job with RO setting it to ANH but their mandate was different because RO was purposely meant to capture the nostalgia of ANH in every way possible which is entirely the movie even exists.

They went about creating a new story set in a familiar era. You can see a galaxy-class federation starship in the skies of Coruscant in Ep.

I and an Astromech flying away during the Kelvin attack. They most certainly could. In the remastered version of TOS the ship looks great.

Look at Star Wars Rogue One. They kept the look so true to A New Hope that you can run A New Hope immediately after Rogue One the one flows right into the other and the look totally fits.

The people in charge of effects made Rogue One look both cutting edge and utterly true to the New Hope era.

They kept the old designs but applied top production values and a huge budget to execution. Discovery could have done this regarding not just the Enterprise, but the look of the entire show.

Rogue One ends approximately 10 minutes before Episode IV begins. What is new is the all-CGI ships and architecture, allowing the filmmakers to stage battle scenes with much greater depth of field in a virtual camera , more moving elements, simulated weather conditions, dust clouds, better compositing, smoke and explosion effects, etc.

A s Enterprise with NX style nacelles and angled pylons, and a bridge window? If it makes sense in context, why not? Future Trek shows will reinterpret it differently too, based on our changing understanding of technology and design.

One could also say it solves the problem Bernd Schneider writes about, which is that the TMP refit is unbelievable, as the design is so different, and nothing really lines up with the original — unless you think Starfleet would tear the ship down to a few beams and rebuild it from scratch rather than just build a different one!

Do you discount The Motion Picture because the Klingons became identical lobster-heads? Do you discount Star Trek VI for the very same reason?

Do you discount The Next Generation for forgetting that an entire planet of androids exists, and for giving the Romulans head bumps?

Do you discount Deep Space Nine for forgetting that several entire planets of shape-shifters exist? But fans love to bitch about nothing.

This list could go on forever. The ship looked different, but folks kept watching and accepted :. There was even a Starlog Magazine article about it which I no longer have, unfortunately.

FLB, I thought it was a disimprovement to the bridge, myself. However, the 4 ft model was glaringly different to my eye from its first appearance, and I found its appearance problematic throughout, because even with the increased detail, it still seemed small, especially in close flybys, owing to what I call the model-size-to-taking-lens relationship.

Otherwise weekly ratings the bane of many a good show lets the plot thicken with too much prior knowledge of future good plot lines. Stick with the storyboard and maybe not the scripts.

Well said Dana. Unfortunately social media gives everyone a voice. No, fortunately it DOES give everyone a voice.

People can agree or disagree. Wow Dana, you just wasted a lot of words totally, willfully missing the point repeatedly- All those changes were on a progression of the show- Discovery is based in a time period when everything is established so there is no room to change anything like they did with the Klingons.

I thought they would make them one of the houses who are genetically different but they just changed the whole race to match. In all those examples they were improving or updating the show as irt progressed, Discovery just re-wrote everything which now contradicts everything else.

We are here because we are all Trek fans, not just Star Trek Discovery fans. Then they should stop whining and complaining.

I was referring to the haters in general that say that. Not you. I was responding to you post. Zoe, you have stopped watching the series.

Why still comment on it? Please leave it to people who have watched the entire 1st Season. Yeah they placed the show in the past relatively speaking then refused to adhere to the proper look in any way.

If this is what they wanted they should have placed the show after Voyager in the timeline. Style and technology are relative.

Berman era Trek is already out of date to some degree. For instance, it has communicators bigger than the TOS ones, despite being set two hundred and fifty years after the invention of the smartphone.

I am unaware of any smartphone that is able to successfully communicate with any person moving at a significant percentage of the speed of light at which those ships travel.

Even modern day satphones, which communicate via moving satellites in orbit, are bulkier than the compact smartphone whose small size fascinates you so.

Also, Discovery is not set in a period that was established. Does that make sense to you? God I hope the next show is in a post-Voyager era.

None of these arguments would exist if Discovery was there today. Not one. But since its not, people just have to accept that the show has to appeal to a younger and newer demographic.

Many people probably never have because it looks so old to them. And to a lot of people the old Enterprise looks too outdated. They had to redesign it somewhat which looks mostly like the movie version and last time I checked most people liked that version and while its also old it still feels modern enough to fit with Discovery and this universe.

They have starfleet officers not in groovy color tops and go-go boots but in military style uniforms talking to hairless Klingons on super size bridges through holographic communication.

None of that fits in with TOS. If this bothers you THAT much you are simply watching the wrong show at this point.

The producers probably have a mandate from CBS to make the show actually look different and actually modern from the old show. There is only so much they can do when compared to TOS.

All of the series, and some odd motion pictures did scripts where they traveled back in time introducing back all these arguments that you claim absolutely would not exist merely by their settings start by being forward of the first series.

One or two episodes is not the same as an entire series. I have made this argument why going back in time to see the Enterprise in s form WORKED in DS9 for example because they did everything to keep that universe in tact like the actual show.

And that was a good idea btw. But it was clearly a one time nostalgia thing. Having it here just feels too distracting for some people. But it is a fantasy, this belief that sentient civilizations, and their technologies and fashions would solely progress ever forward without looking back.

They rise and FALL. During the Cage era they wore essentially the same uniforms we saw on TOS, just cheaper looking.

On Discovery they have completely different uniforms. Some of this stuff does not simply jive with the era its supposedly in.

I get some of your point but its clearly a lot more than that. Discovery does not look or feel like anything from TOS outside of the phasers.

And yet in a decade later we have to somehow pretend the ships will look less advanced and everything smaller. Women will go from very military grade uniforms to now wearing mini-skirts and go-go boots.

Yeah some of it you can suspend your disbelief on for sure but if people are trying to somehow bridge this show with TOS, its a really tall order and unrealistic to a major degree.

But oddly enough if you put this show after TUC, while a lot of it will still not quite work, a lot of it would, especially how the ship interiors are designed.

LOL can we split hairs any more than this? Its essentially the same uniform as TOS, yes with some changes.

My god, are you suggesting that looks like anything in Discovery? Its the same style its just a variance of that style.

Disinvited, sometimes I feel you just want to pick silly fights with me over the tiniest things. OMG, its time to move on.

And pantsuits are NOTHING like miniskirts and there never was a military functional explanation for that radical change in uniform styles.

It seems to have just been a fad which I have already pointed out likely spin rapidly in and out of fashion by that era. Sometimes I feel you purposely misrepresent speakers of points that refute you as if somehow you can change the truth of their facts by claiming that somehow they become lies because of whatever characteristic you find laughable about the person who said it.

As a fan who was around when the original series aired, I have had the pleasure of seeing Star Trek evolve. Discovery is a part of this.

Times ARE far different and how the show can be presented has grown. This is a brilliant post. That hurts my feelings…I loved the TOS design. Not sure what you mean, but the policy of canon has been clearly defined, and what is shown on screen, is canon, set in the prime universe unless otherwise indicated.

I may be a canon thumper but somebody has to be. It is best described as canon on script, visual reboot on screen. Totally canonical it is not as canon is not just what is on a script…and if the show is said to be part of the original universe then canon requires it be consistent as best as possible.

They could have simply enhanced the Klingons a bit. Same with The Enterprise. The TOS design was fine. Just give in the Discovery colouring, metallic look with a bit more surface detail and job done.

There really is no reason to start doing things like changing the pylons and impulse engines. Once they start doing that they cause problems for themselves as it means they have been lying to the fans for 18 months with the insistence the show is canon.

I think the Discovery makers would have made it a damn sight easier for themselves had they simply said it was a loose reboot that casually fit on with prime universe canon, sort of how Superman Returns was a loose sequel to the first two Christopher Reeve Superman movies.

Canon is whether Han shot first, not what his gun looked like. Those lights have to consume a lot of power Maybe they develop new hull playing that masks a certain percentage of the power emissions.

And what if in the course of this next mission the Enterprise gets so badly damaged that a complete refit is absolutely necessary?

Honestly there are just so many possible reasons for the change, all that would fit perfectly with canon. Seems to me you made their point for them.

Good call.. In fact, you could look at the progression of the uniquely shaped colorful aircraft of WWII to flat shaped gray aircraft of today..

My sentiments exactly. They would have a lot more leeway had they not insisted it worked. What they should have done was speak about how the show may not match up exactly into TOS but that they tried to maintain the spirit of Trek in certain instances.

Which is why I am still confounded as to why they made Discovery a prequel. It would work just fine after Nemesis. Probably much better. Dana, I completely agree.

That being said, these are my favorite Klingons. I feel like we finally can see them as complete characters. Still my favorite. If I can accept these changes, then other people need to let go of their nitpicking.

I love this new Trek. Disco nailed it within the 1st 4 episodes. This even explains why Worf said the topic was a shameful taboo.

You obviously never watched Enterprise. They explained the Klingon look of TOS vs everything else. So if Discovery uses the fact they can change a Klingon to make them look human as the reason why TOS Klingons look the way they look they Are ignoring canon and the show no matter how much they insist it is is not in the prime universe at all.

Yeah, not true. So, no, this proves nothing. I thought Enterprise had already explored the cause for physical appearance differentiation throughout the series….

Discovery has provided no such explanation. The writers have hinted at it off screen, but not on screen and so far every single Klingon on the show has been the new version.

They simply have evolved over time. They already did explain the Klingons. The final season of the most recent Star Trek series before Discovery explained that the Klingons used to be ridged, but during the Enterprise era the show Enterprise they stole from the Federation the technology used to make the supermen like Kahn , but this technology only made them look like humans removed their ridges.

It did not make them super strong. Think about it. Yet Discovery pees all of this carefully crafted canon. So sorry your dependence on visual canon upsets your enjoyment of an otherwise entertaining chapter in the Star Trek franchise.

Oh, and canon issues is a minor problem with Discovery. Chup… yes. There are a number of posters who seem to be of the opinion that DIsco is perfect and anyone who questions or criticizes it are just haters with no substance whatsoever behind their thoughts.

Thank you! And those can still pop up in future seasons. In fact I also remembered reading that page they showed the Klingons with ridges in STID and remember that also followed Enterprise canon so yeah, they still had them, period.

But you seem to ignore the FACT they also explained on Enterprise that the ridge-less Klingons was only one segment of the population the was effected by the virus.

The entire Klingon race did not develop smooth foreheads just because a few Klingons screwed around with a super human cocktail.

NCX — Yup. So true. I hope that this issue is addressed in Season 2. Looks more like they have de-evolved. I guess the Augment virus magically disappeared or was cured since Enterprise.

With respect, there was more depth and variety of houses in Berman Trek than there is in Discovery. What do you think? The JJ Prise evolved in a more scary Universe.

The JJ Prise had to be a much more powerful ship for just such an eventuality. The NX similarities do make the look older, however, and maybe that was their intent.

The article here actually makes me appreciate the design more—someone designed this ship knowing fans were going to tear it apart no matter what they did, and I honestly think they were pretty attentive to keeping a lot of details.

Never liked the JJverse version of the Enterprise or the movies, tbh. The Discovery guys did an amazing job without overdoing it — i love it!

JJs is the worst Enterprise I think. Enterprise E is my favourite. Love this all. Bringing back childhood memories of line drawings in notebooks, trying to get the Enterprise just right.

A kid can be excused for not remembering everything right. What excuse do THEY have, with all dimensions and proportions carefully measured; with all those reference images of every single detail of the Enterprise readily available, single mouse click away?

Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews.

Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Rate This. Next Episode. Creators: Bryan Fuller , Alex Kurtzman.

Added to Watchlist. Top-Rated Episodes S2. Error: please try again. New on Netflix India This October. October TV and Streaming Calendar.

Ongoing Series. TV Shows Pocnati-Nedovrseni. Shows to try. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Episodes Next Episode.

E3 People of Earth 7. When you're finished collecting data, you should disable Enterprise Site Discovery. Create a second package to disable Enterprise Site Discovery in Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, as described in the documentation , selecting the following options:.

Skip to main content. Contents Exit focus mode. Enterprise Site Discovery will help you: Discover which sites are using legacy document modes.

Discover which sites are using ActiveX controls. Microsoft Edge doesn't support ActiveX controls. Note You can configure the amount of time a user has to restart the device as described in the client settings documentation.

Is this page helpful? Yes No.

Enterprise Discovery - Inhaltsverzeichnis

Sascha Rotermund. Der Dienstgrad ist anhand von Ärmelstreifen erkennbar, wobei der Captain hier nicht vier, sondern nur drei Streifen trägt. Ausgabe 17 Xindi-Insektoiden-Kreuzer Modell. Was wir über die zweite Staffel wissen. Frequently Asked Questions Q: Why do the Klingons in this series look completely different to how they look in High Crimes – Im Netz Der Lügen Stream of the previous Star Trek shows and films? For this step-by-step, we will configure these options via group policy below. The NX similarities do make the look older, however, and maybe that was their intent. Looks sweet!! After all, the Kelvin-verse Enterprise has been cited with many lengths over the years, Samsung Smart Tv Browser from to meters, and many different things in between. With respect, there was more depth and variety of houses Unterstützte Berman Trek than there is in Discovery. Edit Did You Know? That is a bit more realistic. The writers have hinted at it off screen, but not on screen and so far every single Klingon on the show has been the new version. Stand-alone download managers Enterprise Discovery are available, including the Microsoft Download Manager. In Star Trek Discovery hat die Enterprise einen modernen Anstrich erhalten. Ein Fan hat nun dasselbe mit der Discovery gemacht und ihr den Look der er. Jetzt Staffel 3 auf Netflix ansehen. Unter den Drehbuchautoren und Produzenten von „Discovery“ ist auch Rod Roddenberry, der Sohn des „Star Trek“-Erfinders. Für “Star Trek: Discovery” ist die originale Enterprise nun ein weiteres Mal re-​designt worden und zwar von John Eaves. Während sich Ryan. Doug Jones. Nina The Danish Girl Streaming. Moviejones GbR, abgerufen am Die anderen Schiffe verfügen alle über kantige Gondeln. Abgerufen am 1. Jahr e. Stefan Bräuler. Die Übersetzung hat die kanadische Klingonistin Robyn Stewart Carolin Genreith. Ansichten Lesen Bearbeiten Quelltext Proxy Server österreich Versionsgeschichte. Dieser vermisst seinen Wissenschaftsoffizier Spock, dessen Verschwinden mit den Signalen in Zusammenhang zu stehen scheint. Hannah Cheesman. In: The Hollywood Reporter. Bryan The Flash Burning Series 4Alex Kurtzman.

Enterprise Discovery Surface devices Video

USS Discovery meets USS Enterprise Akzeptieren Datenschutzerklärung. Dass Änderungen am Originalmodell vorgenommen worden sind, Zoey 101 Schauspieler indes unstrittig. Conrad Coates. Der Dienstgrad ist in das Starfleet-Badge integriert. Dort stellt Burnham fest, dass Captain Lorca und der revolutionäre Lorca aus dem Paralleluniversum die Plätze getauscht haben. Andrew Probert und Richard Taylor passten das California Dreams Enterprise-Design an den technischen zum Beispiel berührungsempfindliche Bildschirme und ästhetischen Fortschritt Pastellfarben auf der Brücke an. Hannah Cheesman. Tiny update after work.

Fits very nicely in the discovery universe and is a very nice homage to the original. Well done. I love it. And I also love the extended platform in front of the shuttle bay.

Voyager has it too, like a bunch of other ships. Hopefully landing lights are integrated in the platform.. The front profile looks odd to me, the Enterprise should be tall and graceful.

Otherwise I love all the new details. It evokes the refit, which is my favorite sci-fi design ever. Fyi though, the bridge window originates from on the pilot version of the Enterprise, not the Kelvin movies.

I really was not aware of this detail. This really changes my perception of KU and Disco designs. It was removed after the two pilots.

The two links I have in the article under The original Enterprise s section will give you a ton of information about all the changes between The Cage, WNHGB, and then the series configurations.

Semantics really, it looks exactly the bridge windows we see on the Kelvin and DSC ships. ReignA — I agree. Regardless, for those who are adhere to visual canon, the precedent is theoretically there.

The Enterprise is a gorgeous ship in all her various incarnations, including the latest one. I find her much prettier than the Discovery and a thousand times prettier than, say, the Millennium Falcon.

Seems like a descendant of the NX refit. Lots of elements are similar, like the back of the saucer, secondary hull, pylons and nacelles, and the way the neck and pylons are lower.

As a retcon following that continuity, I think it works quite well. Yeah those nacelles are a neat way of showing the design evolution from the NX to the Enterprise.

Looks sweet!! I love the old bird, but this was done in and with respect. I would love to see the bridge layout to be just like the original but with updated more modern accompaniments.

This is how it should have been in If Gene had the technology today this is how the E would have looked like. A great visual update!

It was pure fan service, but this fan feels thoroughly—uh—serviced. I look forward to seeing and having, I hope a model of it.

Fan service would have been keeping the looking exactly like the original, in my opinion. So that leaves Number One, which again begs what kind of story would they tell with limited crew interaction.

In a few instances, like the phaser and communicator and tricorder designs, they have absolutely nailed an update with more details and improved quality while retaining the lines and spirit of the original.

This Enterprise hits that target. In fact, in a lot of ways this design incorporates the improvements made for the TMP refit which is the best looking ship in Trek history and one of the very best in all of sci-fi and looks better than the original.

The one thing I really hate is the dull grey-silver hull material and the generally dark way the filming is done.

Brighten up the hull material to a more pearly white like she should be and film with a decent light level and this model should really shine.

And why does it seem murky instead of sharp? Interstellar dust? Who knows. That is a bit more realistic. I just wish the space effects were more crisp.

The ships seem blurry to me. TMP Enterprise is really beautiful. I am surprised that design has avoided looking outdated through the years, or maybe I am biased as that was the ship I grew up with.

I love this version of the Enterprise. It really looks more in line with and plausible for the refit version we see in TMP. This new design looks great.

I am happy as can be with this version of the Enterprise. Spock and Dr. Boyce with his bag of martinis. Canon even gives Spock a window where he might be on some kind of extended leave which coincides with this period.

Boyce could have already been replaced with Piper or someone in between the two. Sulu might already be on board — now that might have some interesting story developments with Stamets.

Number One could be gone already, and Pike could be off the ship as well. It all depends on how integral this appearance of the Enterprise is to the plot.

As much as I appreciate the original Enterprise, the neck has always too long and too thin; subsequent designs have tended to shorten and thicken it, which makes the ship look sturdier and tougher, so that is consistent with the Discovery design theme.

The detailing is good. I hate the window in the bridge, like I hate the window in any bridge. I expect the bridge will the same JJ look as the other bridges.

But overall, not bad. Ray Liotta as Pike — cliche I know but all the more reason…. I am not the first to recommend it. Ray Liotta was often suggested as Pike for the movie, including on this very site as a matter of fact.

But I was kidding anyway. Ray Liotta is the spitting image of Jeffrey Hunter. I thought he would have made a better-looking Pike than Greenwood. DF — why exactly is Pike around 38 at this point?

Canon is pretty contradictory here, and has been convoluted by the Abrams movies. I have no issues with this redesign of the Enterprise or it replacing the classic—I kind of like it.

My issue is with the incessant boasting of the producers and writers that this show is in the Prime Timeline.

They should do the same with Discovery. Continuity DOES matter—when you create a show—you want it to be successful right? You want it to get people fixated and keep it running with record breaking ratings?

The studios only kept pumping it out because they knew there was an established fanbase—or else Trek would have fade into obscurity 48 yrs ago.

Or just have the studio establish this series as a reimagined show—it worked for BSG. I love both the original and SyFY versions.

The same can happen for Trek. At least the Kelvin timeline movies established a reason for the differences between it and the original.

The Klingons? At least the older shows offered why their look changed—and that continuity helped the franchise endure.

Holograms, spore drives, Windows instead of view screens? Just call it a reimagined show. The problem is that the tech change between and is bigger than the tech change between TOS and Voyager.

The Enterprise is a good compromise. It looks good in while still looking pretty close to The tech had to change in order to not look silly. Fitting this war into the timeline is an interesting challenge.

Well congratulations on being one of millions that have kept Trek alive—and good for you if you like this series. Even the designs of the Federation starships are too racy and sleek for anything prior to But those that feel as I do, and there are plenty—the ones that have bent and accepted every drastic and subtle change to Trek over its vast history—DISCO being crammed into the Prime timeline, is too much.

Looking at Trek as a whole from the pilot through all the series and movies —if it were one big movie? I could care less what you like and accept—I just want to voice my opinion whether anyone likes it or not.

I could care less if you agree with anything I say. Well of course it is—and I realize there have always been continuity inconsistencies—but the entire Klingons race being refitted no hair come on.

Sure, some explanations were given…but only after about thirty years or so. Beaux, you are really on to something here.

Other people, of course, are going to either agree, disagree, or not care one way or the other. Multimillions of dollars spent on merchandise is but the most tangible evidence of a longtime fan base that has, despite lots of official stumbles at times, believed in the minutia and history of Star Trek.

This is exactly the opposite of what should happen. They got it right by placing it in the prime timeline. Something that was not needed or necessary, something we could do without perfectly well.

I feel like the neck and shuttle bay lip are more like TNG Enterprise. I doubt that the 23rd century is going to look like the s.

Star Trek is an imagining of what the future will look like and those imaginings are constantly evolving as our current technology evolves.

Each show is a product of its time and are visually influenced by the decades they are created in. The visual aesthetics and budgetary production limitations have very little to do with trying to stay true to the story.

They seemed to copy the tricorders and communicators to a T, but everything else has this weird twist. The Borg ship traveling back in time to pre-Enterprise days obviously affected the future.

While we do have modern-day productions of old plays, we also have plenty of modernized versions. They see that the important part of the plays is not really affected by altering the costumes.

There is an old book about the TOS 12ft model and her construction. It shows original memos from Roddenberry and production crews.

The steady-state nacelle lighting is a piece of TNG visual dumbness that just got repeated ad nauseam for the last three decades.

I love every bit of it, including the potato peelers. Actually, I lied. One part does bug me — the apparent lack of scalloping under the primary hull.

It makes the saucer feel too heavy to me. I hated the JJ Enterprise. It was a failure in both design and execution. On top of that, I hated Into Darkness so much that it finally broke me.

Star Trek did not deserve that much control over my feelings. So, shrug. I hope that everyone who is gnashing their teeth over this can eventually find peace.

Just want I wanted to see. The designers have done a cracking job of bringing the Enterprise into the 21st Century without compromising the original design.

A sleek, elegant ship and far better than the Kelvin-verse version. I would like to see the FX shots cleaned up and the ship lighting improved in the next season to really bring it all together.

I see a lot of influence of the A here, the secondary hull shape and struts. Scotty should never have walked onto that primary coloured candy button set, it should have been written to have him walk onto the bridge of the A.

Or, had the budget allowed, an updated, re-imagined version. They should have taken the opportunity then to establish things.

The boys here mentioned Star Wars honoured canon with Rouge One, because they could. What everyone seems to forget….

Star Wars was a movie… with a movie budget. The nacelle struts would never jut out straight as an arrow, and go into the secondary hull in the same shape..

But you know what? They did have enough money to put into that when they made The Motion Picture and by god that was a beauty! And now they had money for fancy sleek consoles and such!

This looks like the NCC, except with more detail and minor tweaks. WildcatDC — technically, the existence of the Kelvin Universe has not been established in canon.

Therefore, with the exception of the Mirror Universe, there is only one universe all of Star Trek has taken place in, only different timelines.

Yes not only did he dump the look but completely moved away from it entirely in TNG. Definitely agree, the later shows made the wrong call when they canonized the TOS sets.

It would be easier for fans to have accepted a retcon of the TOS look back then than now, now that other shows have referenced that look. I actually disagree.

No one at the time EVER thought they would do another show or film based on that era. The point was to do it for nostalgia purposes, not for any real story points.

DS9 was clearly the same idea since it was celebrating TOS 30th anniversary, it was a nice way to represent the show AS we saw it.

It would take away from it if it looked too different. I think the mistake was was trying to base another show in the 23rd century or at least this part of the century.

Prequels in general are usually a bad direction to go in and while I like Discovery nothing done in it has proven to me they had to set it in this era.

In fact the very opposite. I think Discovery is the worst show ever. The science in Star Trek has always been lame.

A huge mystic space water bears is not anymore unrealistic than the warp drive or transporter or holodeck or any one of a hundred things in the show that were scientifically impossible.

None of them would ever work in the real world. New stupid crap meet old stupid crap. But the old stupid crap was good because it was your stupid crap.

What is the space water bear? It updates the look while being faithful to the original with an obvious amount of love for the classic.

I imagine having a staging area outside of the artificial gravity and atmosphere of the shuttle bay might come in handy from time to time.

Exactly, mwz. I can picture worker bees picking up and dropping off cargo outside the shuttle bay doors. I really like the new design. The Kelvin versions are more like twice that length.

It seems like the ships in Discovery tend toward Kelvin timeline size so it will be interesting to see this Enterprise in perspective with the Discovery.

The Discovery does not look anywhere near m long to my eyes. Is it? That said, the Crossfield class is listed with a compliment of , but amazingly a length of In that one 2 second shot we see of them face to face, the Discovery appears to be about the same length as the Enterprise despite the angle of the view.

That said, taking the designs into account, Discovery is practically flat in comparison to the long neck and thick body of the Enterprise, only the lengths are comparable.

That difference in internal area is enough to explain the difference in crew compliment. As an experimental science vessel with only two of the type known why no mention ever of the U.

Crossfield with an NX registry? Now I cannot speak to the highly unusual number that Eaglemoss published, but as a random aside, if you reinterpret the Yes, I know Eaglemoss is a British magazine, so I doubt that is a realistic error.

The only other explanation is the horrifying one. After all, the Kelvin-verse Enterprise has been cited with many lengths over the years, ranging from to meters, and many different things in between.

I find that to be unacceptable. The bulk of the ship, though, seems much less massive. Look back at the Abrams Same potato peeler. I guess I would say that my favorite iteration is the Movie Refit.

My biggest problems were with the neck and pylons. But this is Beautiful. If they made the JJ-prise look like this, I would have liked those movies a lot more, I can tell ya.

Even though in that case it was much more pronounced, like an actual landing pad. I like the design. The enterprise is too small. Discovery something.

Either discovery is the greatest science vessel ever built, essentially bigger and more powerful than a constitution class, heavy cruiser star ship or, Discovery should be smaller than Enterprise.

Even if discovery has arena size labs. Just my thought. This one seems like a bad mixtape. It looks unfinished. It looks mid-refit.

Otherwise why call it TOS? There is a rich history that ties together despite the contradictions. Lighting differences would have worked as well as a redesign.

Like changing the Klingons for no good reason, this was a mistake for no good reason. You can have reverence for something while not being beholden to it.

Some of us would like Star Trek to keep being in the conversation for the next 50 years, and the visual trappings are most certainly not the most important thing about the series.

You Discovery sycophants are like Mikey in the Life cereal commercial. Or maybe people actually like the design? Disconnected reimaginings are for islands.

Continuity is for empires. The second pilot version of the Enterprise. Get a load of those nacelle caps.

Deflector dishes a plenty. Necks of USS Enterprise. Inline Feedbacks. Dana Farricker. February 17, am.

Andrew Pearson. Marc Henson. Bryant Burnette. February 17, pm. February 18, am. February 18, pm. Curious Cadet. February 19, am. April 17, am.

February 21, pm. April 16, am. Fred Javelina. Nobody complained as far as I can recall. David Gatt. Thomas Mitchell. Including you. Really IDICotic.

Luke Montgomery. Dwayne Wood. Gary 8. Captain Ransom. El Chup. February 19, pm. My view is mixed. Something I have already told you today.

Gregory McNeill. February 22, am. The proper look in and was never established in canon. Until now. February 21, am. El Chup, Re: smartphone?

That is a lie. I have seen all past Treks and find Discovery very watchable. Tiger2, Re: None of these arguments would exist if Discovery was… in a post-Voyager era.

Tiger2, But it is a fantasy, this belief that sentient civilizations, and their technologies and fashions would solely progress ever forward without looking back.

Tiger2, Re: During the Cage era they wore essentially the same uniforms What are you smoking? February 22, pm. February 24, am. Re: sometimes I feel Sometimes I feel you purposely misrepresent speakers of points that refute you as if somehow you can change the truth of their facts by claiming that somehow they become lies because of whatever characteristic you find laughable about the person who said it.

Jamie B. March 17, am. March 1, pm. Michael Johnson. February 20, am. Michael Hale. April 1, pm. All hands brace for fanhate! I tried.

My guess for the interier is bright yellows and pale blues…. Dig it. Keep em coming. E R oooo. February 26, am.

February 20, pm. February 24, pm. James D. I second this! I am no fan of the JJ-prise, but this one I like! R W Tompkins.

Micah McElroy. Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Episode List. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide.

External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos.

Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Rate This. Next Episode. Creators: Bryan Fuller , Alex Kurtzman. Added to Watchlist. Top-Rated Episodes S2.

Error: please try again. New on Netflix India This October. October TV and Streaming Calendar. Ongoing Series. TV Shows Pocnati-Nedovrseni. Shows to try.

Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Episodes Next Episode. E3 People of Earth 7. E2 Far from Home 7. Won 1 Primetime Emmy.

Hugh Culber 19 episodes, Michelle Yeoh Taglines: Discover the next chapter. Edit Did You Know? Trivia Because there are many vegans among the cast and crew, the studio catering is certified vegan, as are any props to be eaten or that could potentially be ingested by the actors.

Goofs Despite being a prequel, set 10 years before the original Star Trek and more than a century before The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine and Voyager, the Discovery is far more advanced than any of the ships from those series spore drive, holographic displays, automated self-covering spacesuits, etc.

The first Starfleet ship that was seen using holographic communications as opposed to a standard viewscreen was the Defiant in Deep Space Nine, set approximately years after Discovery.

Alternate Versions The serif-font legends and subtitles in the "broadcast" episodes are absent from the DVD versions, where they are replaced with the standard DVD subtitles.

Was this review helpful to you?

Enterprise Discovery Prerequisites Video

Discovery Enterprise / TOS Enterprise Detailed Comparison - Trekyards Analysis